4.7
am told), a definite feeeling against the higher education of
Chinese, due largely to a fear that they would supplant British,
Se disastrous did this state of things appear to me alike as
regarde British influence for good in China, and from the point of
view of our trade, that I took up the project of a University, though
the majority of British opinion was opposed to it. Its salient
characteristics ware!. It was residential; English was the medium
of instruction; Chinese from China ani el nowhere were welcomed; it
was affiliated to Oxford and Cambridge and students were discouraged
from going to England until they had graduated and their charactera
were to a large extent formed.
It had been our hope to arente « Chinese Faculty with the
object of training men for high administrative and political officein
China who would act as a counterpoise to American influence; but
though supported by both Pakin and Canton who made generous contribu-
tions and sent students, this hope has never been fulfilled, and the
University has been in chronie financial difficulties. The circum-
stances of its foundation precluded an adequate endowment. This was
a riak deliberately accepted,
Apart from a sum of 415,000 to pay off debts owing to the
University by Chinese students, a map of 2250,000 only has been
allotted to the University from the Boxer Indemnity. (Mr. Asary I think
was in favour of at least a million). The interest on this sum would
.0,000 at most, and this will not suffice to do much more than
meet the existing deficit due to the fall in silver which has halved
the salaries of the Staff, and provide some scholarships. The Hongkong
Government which now gives a very heavy subvention ($350,000) 1#
unwilling that a new faculty (e.g. Chinese) should be started unless
assured that it will be self-supporting.
It
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.